[metaslider id=2951] … Read More
Employees are weak link in company cyber attacks
Mark Burnette, For The Tennessean 11:11 p.m. CDT April 29, 2015
Today’s companies face a truly daunting task when trying to protect their computer systems and sensitive data from compromise. Attackers are better coordinated and more sophisticated than ever before, and their tools are easier to obtain and use.
While there are many security issues for businesses to be concerned about (some of which are covered in other installments of this series), an all-too-common problem at companies of all sizes is attacks directed at the computer users themselves. The vulnerable users are workers in the company who have user accounts and passwords and use desktops, laptops, tablets and other devices to interact with a company’s data and network. Hackers and other bad guys target these users because they have access to sensitive data and systems, their account passwords are typically easy to guess or crack, and they are often willing to open a malicious file, click on an emailed link or even willingly type their password into a bogus site.
Protecting your company against end-user attacks requires a two-pronged approach: 1) train your users to help them be more aware of how end-user security attacks occur and 2) configure your systems to make it harder for the bad guys to successfully get in if a user slips up. Here’s a list of steps you should take:
•Keep up to date with security patches provided by software vendors for end-user machines. In addition to operating system patches, be sure to patch application software such as Adobe, Java and web browsers, as older versions of those tools have well-known vulnerabilities that are frequent vectors of attack.
•Provide spam filtering for every machine, with sensitivity controls turned up. One of the most common tactics attackers use to make initial entry into a company’s network is enticing end users to click on a spam email link that installs malware. While this won’t stop every phishing attempt, if you can filter out even one, that is one fewer opportunity for an unsuspecting user to click a bad link.
•Remove local administrator rights from end-user machines. Local administrator rights give a user more power to make changes to a computer, and if an attacker gains control of a machine with those rights, damage to the network can be much more significant.
•Make sure there is up-to-date anti-virus/malware protection installed on every machine.
•Require IT personnel to use different passwords when they work on servers. Even IT administrators can fall victim to email phishing attacks when they are working on their own computer. If they click on a bad link while logged in as an administrator, attackers can gain big-time access to your network using their privileged credentials.
•Develop a security awareness program for all personnel to help them understand their responsibilities when using a company computer system and/or handling sensitive data. This training should also teach users how to create good passwords (ones that are easy to remember, but difficult to guess).
•And perhaps most importantly, require “two-factor authentication” for users logging on to the network from a remote location. That means that a password alone is not enough to gain access; another form of authentication is needed. That could take the form of such things as a fingerprint, a token (a physical device that generates a code that is entered on the machine) or a digital certificate. If two-factor authentication is in place, an attacker who successfully captures a user’s access credentials still won’t be able to remotely connect to the network without the second factor (the token).
Taking all these measures will not completely eliminate the possibility of a successful attack, but it will greatly reduce your exposure to this common attack path, which just might make a potential attacker move on to a more vulnerable target.
Mark Burnette is a partner in the Security and Risk Services practice at LBMC, the largest regional accounting and financial services family of companies based in Tennessee, with offices in Brentwood, Chattanooga and Knoxville.
Cyber Attacks On US Companies in 2014
The spate of recent data breaches at big-name companies such as JPMorgan Chase, Home Depot, and Target raises questions about the effectiveness of the private sector’s information security. According to FBI Director James Comey, “There are two kinds of big companies in the United States. There are those who’ve been hacked…and those who don’t know they’ve been hacked.”
A recent survey by the Ponemon Institute showed the average cost of cyber crime for U.S. retail stores more than doubled from 2013 to an annual average of $8.6 million per company in 2014. The annual average cost per company of successful cyber attacks increased to $20.8 million in financial services, $14.5 million in the technology sector, and $12.7 million in communications industries.
This paper lists known cyber attacks on private U.S. companies since the beginning of 2014. (A companion paper discussed cyber breaches in the federal government.) By its very nature, a list of this sort is incomplete. The scope of many attacks is not fully known. For example, in July, the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team issued an advisory that more than 1,000 U.S. businesses have been affected by the Backoff malware, which targets point-of-sale (POS) systems used by most retail industries. These attacks targeted administrative and customer data and, in some cases, financial data.
APT Attacks
According to an article in info-security, most security professionals expect an APT attack in the next six months. Within the article, it is quoted:
“The three structures of IT Security used to be ‘prevention’, ‘detection’ and ‘remediation’. However, with prevention an almost impossible task due to the very nature of the way IT is used today, it now falls down to ‘detection’ as the best way to protect systems,”.
Prevention is extremely difficult, however, using a defense in depth will assist – implementing a Unified Threat Management system, endpoint protection, as well as utilizing a NAC solution to see who is on your network, as well as stop communication back to command and control, are great first steps.
Using an Event Log Management system or SIEM will help detect abnormal behaviour, improving detection of not only malware or APTS, but also unusual activity by employees, guests, and other cyber threats. Most ELMs, or SIEMs have the ability to do file integrity monitoring as well – providing you with detailed information on what files were altered and by whom.
Take a look at some of our whitepapers on APT’s, or contact us.
US-CERT Advisory
CyrptoLocker Ransomware Infections – Release Date November 05, 2013 | Last revised: November 06, 2013
Systems Affected – Microsoft Windows systems running Windows 7, Vista, and XP operating systems
Overview
US-CERT is aware of a malware campaign that surfaced in 2013 and is associated with an increasing number of ransomware infections. CryptoLocker is a new variant of ransomware that restricts access to infected computers and demands the victim provide a payment to the attackers in order to decrypt and recover their files. As of this time, the primary means of infection appears to be phishing emails containing malicious attachments.
Description
CryptoLocker appears to have been spreading through fake emails designed to mimic the look of legitimate businesses and through phony FedEx and UPS tracking notices. In addition, there have been reports that some victims saw the malware appear following after a previous infection from one of several botnets frequently leveraged in the cyber-criminal underground.
For complete information – Visit the US CERT Website
Employees are number-one cyber security threat
Despite attention-grabbing headlines about cyber-threats from external attackers, company bosses in fact see their own employees as the greatest threat to corporate data and computer systems.
That is the view of 53% of respondents to ‘Boardroom Cyber Watch 2013’, an international survey of senior executive opinion conducted by IT Governance, the global leader in IT governance, risk management and compliance expertise.
The threat from employees was ranked ahead of risks from criminals (27%), state-sponsored cyber-attackers (12%) and competitors (8%) by an international sample of 260 board directors, IT directors and other technology professionals polled by IT Governance in April and May 2013.
The survey confirms the high level of cyber-threat facing today’s organisations, with 25% of bosses saying they have received a ‘concerted attack’ in the past 12 months. However, the true total may be higher, as over 20% are unsure if their organisation has been subject to such an attack.
However, many board directors still appear inadequately informed about cyber-risks. While a majority of respondents say their board receives ‘regular’ reports on the status of their organisation’s IT security, 52% say that such reports are received, at best, annually. Only 5% say reports are submitted daily, with 11% being submitted weekly and 33% monthly.